Robotics Methodology

Version 1

Methodology

Transparent scoring framework. No manufacturer influence. Evidence-first.

What the Score Means

The total score is a practical usefulness score from 0 to 100. It answers one question: if a buyer chooses this robot for a real deployment, how likely is it to deliver value with minimal surprises?

Scoring Pillars

Weighted composite of six independently evaluated dimensions.

Hardware
20%
Intelligence
25%
Safety
20%
Comfort
15%
Ecosystem
10%
Maintenance
10%

If critical specs are missing (payload, runtime, sensors, compute), Hardware and Maintenance scores are capped unless strong third-party validation exists.

Evidence Policy

Every major claim is tagged with one of four verification levels:

Confirmed Likely Unverified Not Disclosed
  • We prefer verified demos, public specs, and credible third-party reporting.
  • If a value is unknown, we mark it Not disclosed — we do not guess.
  • Scores update as new evidence appears. Methodology versions are archived.

Affiliate Independence

Affiliate links do not affect scoring. If a robot is linked via affiliate, the score remains unchanged unless new evidence changes the underlying evaluation.

Update Cadence

Every profile is reviewed quarterly (or sooner for major releases). Updates include: availability status, price signals, new demos, and a "What changed since last quarter?" changelog entry. Re-scoring occurs only when evidence changes materially.